It is currently Thu Mar 28, 2024 11:35 am



This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 23 posts ] 
 who needs evolution the most?????????? 
Author Message
Bug Catcher
Bug Catcher

Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2004 5:09 am
Posts: 2
Location: in a house
I say lickitung, those stats are awful!!!!! and then there's kangaskhan, and many others.

_________________
=<sum>:-k


Sun Oct 10, 2004 8:32 am
Profile
Psychic Trainer
Psychic Trainer
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 11:41 am
Posts: 90
Location: The one place you didn't look.
Post 
Kangaskhan needs a pre-evo, Fearow definately needs an evolution, it doesn't have the best moveset, but those stats are great for an UU.

_________________
<center><img src="http://dynamic3.gamespy.com/~psypoke/forums/images/trainercards/Frostfire.png"></center>
http://www.pokemondungeon.com


Sun Oct 10, 2004 9:15 am
Profile WWW
Pokemon Trainer
Pokemon Trainer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2004 11:20 pm
Posts: 35
Location: New York(not the city)
Post 
Probably Farfetch'd....its not that great, not to mention the Stick you recieve from it isn't worth much either...

_________________
<center><img src="http://dynamic3.gamespy.com/~psypoke/forums/images/trainercards/DarkUfrades.png"></center>
Current Battle Tower Team
{muk}(shiny) Lvl.50 {alakazam} Lvl.50 {metagross} Lvl.50 {bellossom} Lvl.50 {armaldo} Lvl.50 {blaziken} Lvl.50


Sun Oct 10, 2004 3:37 pm
Profile
Pokemon Trainer
Pokemon Trainer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2004 3:33 pm
Posts: 39
Location: Dragon's Den
Post 
About Kangaskhan: That baby needs to be playable. I never understood why when a Kangaskhan hatches, it is an adult with it's own baby. Also, it's odd how you capture both the mother and child in the same ball.

_________________
<center><img src="http://dynamic3.gamespy.com/~psypoke/forums/images/trainercards/LancesDragonair.png"></center>


Sun Oct 10, 2004 4:31 pm
Profile
Ace Trainer
Ace Trainer
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 7:09 pm
Posts: 398
Post 
well, in terms of 1-151, I'd say maybe Seaking, it's so terrible...

A Lickitung evo'd be neat, as well as a Fearow and Farfetch'd... heh, Imagine a Dodrio evo with 4 or 5 heads.... skeery...


Sun Oct 10, 2004 6:46 pm
Profile
Bug Catcher
Bug Catcher
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2004 3:07 am
Posts: 7
Location: monkey island
Post 
lickitung definitly i wish legendarys had evolutions ho oh ,mewtwo into into mewthree etc

_________________
{deoxys} {aipom} {primeape} {vigoroth} {mankey}
we all are actually monkey<center><img src="http://dynamic3.gamespy.com/~psypoke/forums/images/trainercards/monkeymaster.png"></center>s


Thu Oct 21, 2004 3:12 pm
Profile
Pokemon Ranger
Pokemon Ranger
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 10:10 am
Posts: 710
Location: Nebraska
Post 
Two words: {sneasel}.

_________________
My band, from dust. CAUTION: Not hipster-approved.


Thu Oct 21, 2004 8:32 pm
Profile
Bug Catcher
Bug Catcher
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2004 3:07 am
Posts: 7
Location: monkey island
Post 
also agree with papersun

_________________
{deoxys} {aipom} {primeape} {vigoroth} {mankey}
we all are actually monkey<center><img src="http://dynamic3.gamespy.com/~psypoke/forums/images/trainercards/monkeymaster.png"></center>s


Fri Oct 22, 2004 2:01 am
Profile
Bug Catcher
Bug Catcher
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 3:26 pm
Posts: 19
Location: Metor Falls
Post 
Yeah I agree that legendaries need evolutions. But on the other hand, some lagendaries look like they evolve from other legends. When I first saw Ho-oh, and it was legendary, and a fire/flying type, I actually thought that it was evolved from Moltres. I also thought that the other trio birds needed an evolution, too. And mew looks lke it evolves from Mewtwo.

_________________
I am the best Blaziken trainer!!!


Sat Oct 23, 2004 12:04 pm
Profile
Ace Trainer
Ace Trainer
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2004 12:00 am
Posts: 333
Location: Australia Gender: Male Awsome-Factor: 1337
Post 
Blaziken Trainer wrote:
Yeah I agree that legendaries need evolutions. But on the other hand, some lagendaries look like they evolve from other legends. When I first saw Ho-oh, and it was legendary, and a fire/flying type, I actually thought that it was evolved from Moltres. I also thought that the other trio birds needed an evolution, too. And mew looks lke it evolves from Mewtwo.


Ledgendaries don't need evolutions. That would make them more Uber then before, it just doesn't seem right.

_________________
"In a world without walls or fences, what need it there for windows or gates?" - CEO of Appple


Sun Oct 24, 2004 12:06 am
Profile WWW
Psychic Trainer
Psychic Trainer
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 9:30 am
Posts: 89
Location: In A Sneasel And Weavile Lair
papersun wrote:
Two words: {sneasel}.


first of all - how is {sneasel} two words when it's a picture and even it's name is one word. and why does sneasel need an evolution - it's pretty strong anyway, being a dark type and being......... ummmmmmm...... strong.

ok, ok, i've changed my mind - it would be good if every pokemon had an evolution apart from, maybe, legendaries. But i don't think sneasel needs an evolution.

_________________
This signature has violated the new signature rules. Please review these before re-creating your signature. Failure to comply will result in a loss of your signature privileges.


Sat Oct 30, 2004 6:22 am
Profile
Pokemon Trainer
Pokemon Trainer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2004 3:33 pm
Posts: 39
Location: Dragon's Den
Post 
First of all, it was a joke.

Second, Sneasel could easily become a better Pokemon. It doesn't have great stats at the moment.

_________________
<center><img src="http://dynamic3.gamespy.com/~psypoke/forums/images/trainercards/LancesDragonair.png"></center>


Sat Oct 30, 2004 4:27 pm
Profile
Ace Trainer
Ace Trainer
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 7:09 pm
Posts: 398
Post 
Sableye needs to evolve. badly. It needs a stat boost and a better trait. Granted, not something uber *coughwonderguardcough*, but not the suckiness that is Keen Eye... why can't it have Clear Body or something?

Dunsparce needs to evolve, too.


Sat Oct 30, 2004 9:53 pm
Profile
Bug Catcher
Bug Catcher
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2004 11:44 pm
Posts: 3
Post 
maybe legandaries can be babies with rubbish stats while we catch them, then evolve into a 00ber...

_________________
<center><img src="http://dynamic3.gamespy.com/~psypoke/forums/images/trainercards/FreemanTheGreatest.png"></center>


Sun Oct 31, 2004 1:01 am
Profile
Psychic Trainer
Psychic Trainer
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 9:30 am
Posts: 89
Location: In A Sneasel And Weavile Lair
FreemanTheGreatest wrote:
maybe legandaries can be babies with rubbish stats while we catch them, then evolve into a 00ber...


actually - that aint a half bad idea - good one. I think they should evolve after you have completed a goal - for example - 20 trades, or something...

_________________
This signature has violated the new signature rules. Please review these before re-creating your signature. Failure to comply will result in a loss of your signature privileges.


Mon Nov 01, 2004 10:43 am
Profile
Ace Trainer
Ace Trainer
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2004 12:00 am
Posts: 333
Location: Australia Gender: Male Awsome-Factor: 1337
Post 
Mr. Saturn wrote:
Sableye needs to evolve. badly. It needs a stat boost and a better trait. Granted, not something uber *coughwonderguardcough*, but not the suckiness that is Keen Eye... why can't it have Clear Body or something?

Dunsparce needs to evolve, too.


Wonder Guard on Sableye would be very nice. Though any non-evolution pokemon that has bad stats (I am too lazy to make a list though Aipom is one) needs to evolve.

_________________
"In a world without walls or fences, what need it there for windows or gates?" - CEO of Appple


Mon Nov 01, 2004 11:48 pm
Profile WWW
Lite Four
Lite Four
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 3:03 am
Posts: 3827
Location: Singapore
Post 
{aipom} , {yanma} , {dunsparce} , {gligar} , {shuckle}

It would be interesting if Pokemon like Ditto evolved. What would it have become, a greater mass of jelly? And maybe Corsola can evolve to a coral reef, porygon to lego, and octillery to sushi.


Wed Nov 03, 2004 12:38 am
Profile
Psychic Trainer
Psychic Trainer
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 9:30 am
Posts: 89
Location: In A Sneasel And Weavile Lair
Post 
sN0wBaLL wrote:
{aipom} , {yanma} , {dunsparce} , {gligar} , {shuckle}

It would be interesting if Pokemon like Ditto evolved. What would it have become, a greater mass of jelly? And maybe Corsola can evolve to a coral reef, porygon to lego, and octillery to sushi.


a porygon evolution alredy exists {porygon2} . you're right about a ditto evolution being interesting, however, what would it do? ditto could evolve into anything it has transformed to in the past??????????

_________________
This signature has violated the new signature rules. Please review these before re-creating your signature. Failure to comply will result in a loss of your signature privileges.


Wed Nov 03, 2004 11:39 am
Profile
Psychic Trainer
Psychic Trainer
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 5:05 pm
Posts: 93
Location: here
Post 
dosen't {dunsparce} evolve into {gligar} ??
anyway, subleye's evolution would be interesting..
hmm.. sushi..

_________________
scythers. cause they're green.


Wed Nov 03, 2004 11:42 am
Profile
Ace Trainer
Ace Trainer
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 7:09 pm
Posts: 398
Post 
psycho_freak wrote:
Mr. Saturn wrote:
Sableye needs to evolve. badly. It needs a stat boost and a better trait. Granted, not something uber *coughwonderguardcough*, but not the suckiness that is Keen Eye... why can't it have Clear Body or something?

Dunsparce needs to evolve, too.


Wonder Guard on Sableye would be very nice. Though any non-evolution pokemon that has bad stats (I am too lazy to make a list though Aipom is one) needs to evolve.


problem is, the simple fact that its only weakness would be fighting after using Foresight would make the game unfair...

and no, Dunsparce and Gligar are completely different.


Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:31 pm
Profile
Pokemon Trainer
Pokemon Trainer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2004 3:33 pm
Posts: 39
Location: Dragon's Den
Post 
Shuckle doesn't need and evolution. It's defense stats are already through the roof, there is no need for improvement. It's one of those token Pokemon that don't need evolutions (Ditto, Smeargle, Kecleon, Castform, Wobbuffet, and the legendaries) because they already serve their purpose.

_________________
<center><img src="http://dynamic3.gamespy.com/~psypoke/forums/images/trainercards/LancesDragonair.png"></center>


Wed Nov 03, 2004 5:34 pm
Profile
Bug Catcher
Bug Catcher
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 9:06 pm
Posts: 15
Location: The Fiery Gates Of Mount Ember
Post 
I think {scyther} should have a pre-evolution. Like a baby or something. It would be neat. Opinions?

_________________
<i><b>Burn Baby Burn!</b></i>
<i>Blazizard</i>
{charizard}{typhlosion}{arcanine}{ho-oh}{moltres}{entei}{blaziken}
<img src="http://www.vilhjalmur.com/butterfree/yacharizard.jpg" alt="Find out what pokémon you are at The Cave of Dragonflies!">


Wed Nov 03, 2004 8:51 pm
Profile
Bug Catcher
Bug Catcher
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 3:26 pm
Posts: 19
Location: Metor Falls
Post 
I think a Ditto evo'd be cool. hmmmmmmm... maybe call it uummmmmmm... Prango like "presto-chango".
Or maybe an E. stone evo like Pyrto (fire) or Freezto (ice) Florto (grass)




On a semi-related note, have you fought a Ditto with a legendary?
I'm staring down the barrel of another Aerticuno with the same moveset right now. hmm.

_________________
I am the best Blaziken trainer!!!


Thu Nov 04, 2004 7:08 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.   [ 23 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.