Psypoke http://www.psypokes.com/forums/ |
|
grammerz http://www.psypokes.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=50&t=25962 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | DatVu [ Wed Mar 03, 2010 9:15 am ] |
Post subject: | grammerz |
(16:46) DatVu: Fat people can't really tell their pregnant (16:46) Patchy: Drunk people dont know there grammar =p (16:46) DatVu: What?! are you making fun of my grammarz? (16:46) Patchy: YEAH, THEIR FUNNY Patchy wrote: mine wud be a shiny palkia.hes so cool anyway and shiny is just deadly. and as far as *I* know on diamond and pearl a ditto will transform into a normal pokemon but on R/S/E if it is shiny then when it transforms it will be the shiny form
Patchy wrote: sorry!
and i COMPLETLEY agree with you about the white stripes! my friends keep sayin ''white stripes are better than FOB!!!'' it gets REALLY annoying. (especially when the start goin on about the editors ) TCCCCCHHHHHHTAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABLLLLLLLLLLBBBLHHHAAAAAAAAAAAYYYYYWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWDUBCYIAPG GGGGGRRRRRAAAAAMMMMMMMMMMAAAAARRRRRAAAAAWWWWWRRRRR!!
AAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!! |
Author: | Jamie [ Wed Mar 03, 2010 10:20 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: grammerz |
Author: | Patchy [ Wed Mar 03, 2010 10:54 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: grammerz |
Quote: He's so cool anyway, and [a] shiny is just deadly THAT A SHOULDNT BE THERE. I WAS TALKING ABOUT HOW PALKIA IS DEADLY AND HIS SHINY FORM IS TOO. 12 Year Old Patchy knew what he was talking about. Fu grammar natvu. I think just for this im gna typ dum agen |
Author: | DatVu [ Wed Mar 03, 2010 11:00 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: grammerz |
THEN THE INDEPENDENT CLAUSE NEEDS A SUBJECT! THE READER IS LOST TO DETERMINE WHETHER THE SENTENCE EXPLAINS A SPECIFIC OR MULTIPLE SHINIES AND REQUIRES AN ARTICLE REGARDLESS, LEST THE WORD BE SIMPLY AN ADJECTIVE DESCRIBING ANY SUBJECT WHICH FALLS UNDER THE CATERGORY! Jamie wrote: ALSO, LOL. |
Author: | Patchy [ Wed Mar 03, 2010 11:04 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: grammerz |
LEAVE ME ALONE OR ILL ILL ILL HUFF AND ILL PUFF AND ILL BLOW YOUR house down. |
Author: | DatVu [ Wed Mar 03, 2010 11:14 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: grammerz |
HOUSE! |
Author: | Jamie [ Wed Mar 03, 2010 12:20 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: grammerz |
DatVu wrote: THEN THE INDEPENDENT CLAUSE NEEDS A SUBJECT! THE READER IS LOST TO DETERMINE WHETHER THE SENTENCE EXPLAINS A SPECIFIC OR MULTIPLE SHINIES AND REQUIRES AN ARTICLE REGARDLESS, LEST THE WORD BE SIMPLY AN ADJECTIVE DESCRIBING ANY SUBJECT WHICH FALLS UNDER THE CATERGORY! |
Author: | Dan Roswald [ Wed Mar 03, 2010 2:40 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: grammerz |
Oh my god, it hurts my brain! And the people that use excessive texting language? "Da" and "tat" are not even close to English! |
Author: | Inta Xonem [ Wed Mar 03, 2010 4:23 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: grammerz |
Quote: (16:46) DatVu: Fat people can't really tell their pregnant
(16:46) Patchy: Drunk people dont know there grammar =p (16:46) DatVu: What?! are you making fun of my grammarz? (16:46) Patchy: YEAH, THEIR FUNNY i love this quote silly patchy. |
Author: | Patchy [ Thu Mar 04, 2010 5:56 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: grammerz |
Quote: Even thoughs who [...] EXCUSE ME MR VU WHAT IS THIS??? Quote: but I am looking for some improvment Sadly, so am I. Quote: that's all that matters!!!!!!!!!!!!! 13? Really? It's okay, we believe you! And that's just on the first page of your posts. Oh no. ;D |
Author: | ksemanr [ Fri Mar 05, 2010 4:21 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: grammerz |
I do believe that this is relevant to the topic at hand. |
Author: | Dan Roswald [ Fri Mar 05, 2010 6:28 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: grammerz |
XD I think I just burst into laughter there. Awesome video. |
Author: | ksemanr [ Sun Mar 07, 2010 2:31 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: grammerz |
This is equally relevant as well. |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |