Psypoke
http://www.psypokes.com/forums/

.
http://www.psypokes.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=50&t=24665
Page 2 of 4

Author:  EvilPenguin [ Sat May 23, 2009 10:15 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: .

Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image

Author:  goldenquagsire [ Sun May 24, 2009 3:19 am ]
Post subject:  Re: .

Oh, sieg heil, boys.

Author:  *superiorchingling* [ Sun May 24, 2009 10:51 am ]
Post subject:  Re: .

How do you know if they're all boys?
They could be girls disguised as boys for all you know...
{chingling}

Author:  RageAgainstMachine [ Sun May 24, 2009 11:09 am ]
Post subject:  Re: .

Registeel_Rocks wrote:
Sneaky Sneasel wrote:
Worst. Topic. Ever.

Image
^S_S writing that post


Worst. Reference. Ever.

Author:  waterpokemonmaniac [ Mon May 25, 2009 10:26 am ]
Post subject:  Re: .

that's five minutes of my life i'll never get back O_O.
=)

Author:  *superiorchingling* [ Mon May 25, 2009 10:52 am ]
Post subject:  Re: .

LolHitler.
Oh I SAY
{chingling}

Author:  Inta Xonem [ Mon May 25, 2009 11:12 am ]
Post subject:  Re: .

Quote:
How do you know if they're all boys?
They could be girls disguised as boys for all you know...


This is a serious point. Someone should check.

You noticed, so you should do it. Copy and paste every one in turn into paint, , then compare all the feminine and masculine features in each. Make a list of your findings. Obviously, it'll take you so long, and you'll be so busy, you wont be able to post for a whole month. We all have to make this sacrafice for the greater cause though.

See you in a month? ): {chingling}

((psst anyone think this'll work?))

Author:  Patchy [ Mon May 25, 2009 11:16 am ]
Post subject:  Re: .

Aww, ix thats mean. =[

{teddiursa}

Author:  Inta Xonem [ Mon May 25, 2009 2:45 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: .

You have a point, it is a bit mean to reveal someone's disguise isn't it. Plus if its 'hitler' she might kill us D:

Thats the main reason I nominate you to be Chinglings security guard when looking for any hers :D!

Author:  EvilPenguin [ Mon May 25, 2009 3:07 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: .

fun fact: hitler was secretly a closeted lesbian who liked wearing men's clothes and wearing fake mustaches

Author:  rubypoke [ Mon May 25, 2009 3:29 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: .

EvilPenguin wrote:
fun fact: hitler was secretly a closeted lesbian who liked wearing men's clothes and wearing fake mustaches



Silly thing is, someone in my class included something around those lines in his History Essay a few months back and didn't get a fail...
This thread relaxes me when i'm stressed it seems.

Author:  *superiorchingling* [ Tue May 26, 2009 10:57 am ]
Post subject:  Re: .

Inta Xonem wrote:
Quote:
How do you know if they're all boys?
They could be girls disguised as boys for all you know...


This is a serious point. Someone should check.

You noticed, so you should do it. Copy and paste every one in turn into paint, , then compare all the feminine and masculine features in each. Make a list of your findings. Obviously, it'll take you so long, and you'll be so busy, you wont be able to post for a whole month. We all have to make this sacrafice for the greater cause though.

See you in a month? ): {chingling}

((psst anyone think this'll work?))


Funny how Pokemon Rangers like making fun of me, huh?
{chingling}

Author:  Patchy [ Tue May 26, 2009 11:18 am ]
Post subject:  Re: .

And bug catchers

Well you are a dragon tamer, sheesh. Go talk to us when you get more posts~

Author:  *superiorchingling* [ Tue May 26, 2009 11:38 am ]
Post subject:  Re: .

Oh, so dreadfully sorry. Please, oh master of masters, forgive me.
:roll:
{chingling}

Author:  Patchy [ Tue May 26, 2009 11:46 am ]
Post subject:  Re: .

I really hope you, too, are being sarcastic.

Author:  EvilPenguin [ Tue May 26, 2009 2:11 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: .

Image

Too much failure, not deserving of a 50 double facepalm post

Author:  *superiorchingling* [ Wed May 27, 2009 5:00 am ]
Post subject:  Re: .

Patchy wrote:
I really hope you, too, are being sarcastic.

Oh no, I'm deadly serious.
No, I'm not. I would never say that to anyone, ever. It would suck and decrease my superiority, which would make me "*inferiorchingling*". Who wants a name like that??
The only faliure around here is that picture.
{chingling}

Author:  Poe [ Wed May 27, 2009 12:21 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: .

EvilPenguin wrote:
Image

Too much failure, not deserving of a 50 double facepalm post


Take a hint.

Also, Captain James Tiberius Kirk ftw.

Author:  EvilPenguin [ Wed May 27, 2009 3:44 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: .

'Scuse you, that is Captain Jean-Luc Picard of the Starship Enterprise. Get it right.

Author:  Poe [ Wed May 27, 2009 3:49 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: .

oh my bad. wow that was some epic fail right there.

Author:  *superiorchingling* [ Thu May 28, 2009 5:36 am ]
Post subject:  Re: .

Honestly, is that all we get around here? ZOMGEPICFAILIUR!!!!!!!!11 It must be contagious.
{chingling}

Author:  rubypoke [ Thu May 28, 2009 7:32 am ]
Post subject:  Re: .

I'm pretty sure this sub-forum has been made an epic-failure over the last few days, it's starting to cripple my eyes ;[.

Author:  goldenquagsire [ Thu May 28, 2009 11:25 am ]
Post subject:  Re: .

it was ever not epic failure?

Author:  The_Shedinja_Ninja [ Thu May 28, 2009 11:34 am ]
Post subject:  Re: .

rubypoke wrote:
I'm pretty sure this sub-forum has been made an epic-failure over the last few days, it's starting to cripple my eyes ;[.

Dude, this forum is filled with epic failures. There's actually a list that The Grand Arbiter made (its a locked thread in this sub forum)that lists all the epic fails from the "oh no mudkips is dead" era of the forum. Thats how much of a failure this forum is.


Oh, and EvilPenguin: when I say stop, I mean Stop!
I hate multiple posts of the same picture on a forum reply. You try scrolling through that on a PSP. Not fun. Not fun at all.
Let's keep it clean, folks.

Author:  rubypoke [ Fri May 29, 2009 5:08 am ]
Post subject:  Re: .

goldenquagsire wrote:
it was ever not epic failure?


Good shout. The minute the name 'mudkip' popped up, it fell to a new low of epic failure.

Page 2 of 4 All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/