Psypoke
http://www.psypokes.com/forums/

Fossils, Fossils and MORE FOSSILS!
http://www.psypokes.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=835
Page 1 of 1

Author:  Pokemaster2005 [ Sun Dec 26, 2004 6:31 pm ]
Post subject:  Fossils, Fossils and MORE FOSSILS!

The Root Fossil....
The Claw Fossil....

What pokemon are they?
Where's the lab that reproduces fossils? Is it in the Devon Co. building?

Why did Nintendo have to make it so that "If this fossil is taken, the other
one will sink into the sand?"

So that they can make you buy the other version, whether it be Ruby or
Sapphire and FORCE you to spend an additional $47.94 at Walmart?

Author:  kappa [ Sun Dec 26, 2004 7:29 pm ]
Post subject: 

Holy Crap! It cost you $47.94 for R/S, Where I am, you can get it for like $29.99 at Wal Mart.
Now...
Root fossil: You get lileep: {lileep} that evolves into cradily: {cradily}
they are rock/grass types.

Claw fossil: You get anorith: {anorith} that evolves into armaldo: {armaldo} they are bug/rock types.

You talk to the guy on 2f of Devon to get your fossil revived.

Author:  Pokemaster2005 [ Sun Dec 26, 2004 7:40 pm ]
Post subject: 

Which one's better?

Author:  sN0wBaLL [ Sun Dec 26, 2004 8:14 pm ]
Post subject: 

A quick look around the Psydex on the main site would have told you all that you needed to know actually. Regarding which of the two Pokemon is better, it really depends on how you use them. Personally I prefer Armaldo's physical sweeping capability, but I use Cradily as well and it ain't bad. So you should probably take a look at both Cradily's and Armaldo's Pokedex entries to decide for yourself:

Cradily: http://dynamic3.gamespy.com/~psypoke/de ... 6&view=all

Armaldo: http://dynamic3.gamespy.com/~psypoke/de ... 8&view=all

If you need help getting movesets, feel free to post in the Rating Centre.

Author:  Venumeleon [ Sun Dec 26, 2004 8:28 pm ]
Post subject: 

I like Armaldo better, but that's just personally. Cradily is ideal for trapping, annoyance, etc. while Armaldo is more suited to physical sweeping.

Author:  leet for [ Wed Dec 29, 2004 4:25 pm ]
Post subject: 

when it first came out over here it was :shock: $69.95!!!!!!!!!!

Author:  Evil Pikachu [ Wed Dec 29, 2004 4:36 pm ]
Post subject: 

leet for wrote:
when it first came out over here it was :shock: $69.95!!!!!!!!!!


It gets around that too, here in Mexico. Luckily, since we live so close to the US frontier, we go several times a year to the US on "shopping trips." 8)

Author:  TheCyberMew [ Wed Dec 29, 2004 5:32 pm ]
Post subject: 

leet for wrote:
when it first came out over here it was :shock: $69.95!!!!!!!!!!


Wow, where do you live? Here, all new GBA games are between 29.99-39.99, never more.

Author:  papersun [ Thu Dec 30, 2004 12:53 pm ]
Post subject: 

When they came out here they were $32.99 and FR/LG were $34.99 . . .

I prefer to use Cradily as a tank and Armaldo as a sweeper. But Cradily can sweep and Armaldo can tank, so it's really up to you.

Author:  Pokemaster2005 [ Fri Dec 31, 2004 8:13 pm ]
Post subject: 

In Canada, Walmart charges us $47.94 for Ruby and Sapphire
and $43.97 for FireRed and Leafgreen.

But EB Games is just ripping people off!
$59.99!

Come on, people!

I think that the real question here is if we are that gullible to buy whatever
pokemon games we want, no matter what the price is.

For instance, what happens when the price becomes $100 per game? :evil:

Author:  dragonfan149 [ Fri Dec 31, 2004 8:15 pm ]
Post subject: 

Buy it in the not rip-off USA :)

Author:  KidTijid [ Fri Dec 31, 2004 8:16 pm ]
Post subject: 

should what you just say be a different topic in general discussion? Well if they did that for every game and such that would SUCK! but people who are rich enough would probably buy them but not have as many sales... it would make lots of people mad and probably less sales... so drop it back down... >.>

Author:  Pokemaster2005 [ Fri Dec 31, 2004 8:20 pm ]
Post subject: 

dragonfan#149 wrote:
Buy it in the not rip-off USA :)


Actually, $29.99 USA equals about $47.94 Canada.
The prices are the same! :?

Author:  dragonfan149 [ Fri Dec 31, 2004 8:26 pm ]
Post subject: 

sry i forgot about that :( (i was just there 2 months ago)

Author:  leet for [ Sun Jan 02, 2005 3:13 am ]
Post subject: 

i live in australia, vic, taralgon

Author:  black_flygon [ Sat Mar 05, 2005 11:05 pm ]
Post subject: 

all this country dealing is giving me a headache....like evil {pikachu} i too live in mexico...but in the capital...and i though i was the only one from another country.....well nice to know ya....

Author:  Truestar [ Sun Mar 06, 2005 1:05 pm ]
Post subject: 

Please do not revive topics. It gives you a bad reputation.

Author:  black_flygon [ Sun Mar 06, 2005 5:59 pm ]
Post subject: 

what do you mean by "revive"?

since i am quite new...(and in another country) i quite dont get some expressions!!!

Author:  Sneaky Sneasel [ Sun Mar 06, 2005 6:05 pm ]
Post subject: 

Another term is necromacy, it basically means that you posting on a topic that hasnt had a post in 3-4 weeks, which is very, very bad, gives you a bad rep, which is very, very bad.

Author:  Platinumdelcatty [ Tue Mar 04, 2008 5:36 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Fossils, Fossils and MORE FOSSILS!

Pokemaster2005 wrote:
The Root Fossil....
The Claw Fossil....

What pokemon are they?
Where's the lab that reproduces fossils? Is it in the Devon Co. building?

Why did Nintendo have to make it so that "If this fossil is taken, the other
one will sink into the sand?"

So that they can make you buy the other version, whether it be Ruby or
Sapphire and FORCE you to spend an additional $47.94 at Walmart?

hey on emerald you can get both, its very complicated to explain how though, i jus cloned rare candies with em and got about 450 rare candies, and used em all on kyogre, and the 2 fossils, Claw has Anorith, Root has Lileep

Author:  whipwhip [ Wed Mar 05, 2008 3:55 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Fossils, Fossils and MORE FOSSILS!

when emerald version came out here in tokyo it costs around 4400 yen. anyway, just have emerald version so you can have both fossils.

Author:  JsXtm [ Wed Mar 05, 2008 7:50 am ]
Post subject:  Re:

Sneaky Sneasel wrote:
Another term is necromacy, it basically means that you posting on a topic that hasnt had a post in 3-4 weeks, which is very, very bad, gives you a bad rep, which is very, very bad.

OR OVER 3 YEARS, Platinumdelcatty. *Locked*

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/