Psypoke
http://www.psypokes.com/forums/

who needs evolution the most??????????
http://www.psypokes.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=474
Page 1 of 1

Author:  dancing penguin [ Sun Oct 10, 2004 8:32 am ]
Post subject:  who needs evolution the most??????????

I say lickitung, those stats are awful!!!!! and then there's kangaskhan, and many others.

Author:  FrostFire [ Sun Oct 10, 2004 9:15 am ]
Post subject: 

Kangaskhan needs a pre-evo, Fearow definately needs an evolution, it doesn't have the best moveset, but those stats are great for an UU.

Author:  DarkUfrades [ Sun Oct 10, 2004 3:37 pm ]
Post subject: 

Probably Farfetch'd....its not that great, not to mention the Stick you recieve from it isn't worth much either...

Author:  Lance's Dragonair [ Sun Oct 10, 2004 4:31 pm ]
Post subject: 

About Kangaskhan: That baby needs to be playable. I never understood why when a Kangaskhan hatches, it is an adult with it's own baby. Also, it's odd how you capture both the mother and child in the same ball.

Author:  Mr. Saturn [ Sun Oct 10, 2004 6:46 pm ]
Post subject: 

well, in terms of 1-151, I'd say maybe Seaking, it's so terrible...

A Lickitung evo'd be neat, as well as a Fearow and Farfetch'd... heh, Imagine a Dodrio evo with 4 or 5 heads.... skeery...

Author:  monkey master [ Thu Oct 21, 2004 3:12 pm ]
Post subject: 

lickitung definitly i wish legendarys had evolutions ho oh ,mewtwo into into mewthree etc

Author:  papersun [ Thu Oct 21, 2004 8:32 pm ]
Post subject: 

Two words: {sneasel}.

Author:  monkey master [ Fri Oct 22, 2004 2:01 am ]
Post subject: 

also agree with papersun

Author:  Blaziken Trainer [ Sat Oct 23, 2004 12:04 pm ]
Post subject: 

Yeah I agree that legendaries need evolutions. But on the other hand, some lagendaries look like they evolve from other legends. When I first saw Ho-oh, and it was legendary, and a fire/flying type, I actually thought that it was evolved from Moltres. I also thought that the other trio birds needed an evolution, too. And mew looks lke it evolves from Mewtwo.

Author:  psycho_freak [ Sun Oct 24, 2004 12:06 am ]
Post subject: 

Blaziken Trainer wrote:
Yeah I agree that legendaries need evolutions. But on the other hand, some lagendaries look like they evolve from other legends. When I first saw Ho-oh, and it was legendary, and a fire/flying type, I actually thought that it was evolved from Moltres. I also thought that the other trio birds needed an evolution, too. And mew looks lke it evolves from Mewtwo.


Ledgendaries don't need evolutions. That would make them more Uber then before, it just doesn't seem right.

Author:  SneakySneasel [ Sat Oct 30, 2004 6:22 am ]
Post subject:  huh?

papersun wrote:
Two words: {sneasel}.


first of all - how is {sneasel} two words when it's a picture and even it's name is one word. and why does sneasel need an evolution - it's pretty strong anyway, being a dark type and being......... ummmmmmm...... strong.

ok, ok, i've changed my mind - it would be good if every pokemon had an evolution apart from, maybe, legendaries. But i don't think sneasel needs an evolution.

Author:  Lance's Dragonair [ Sat Oct 30, 2004 4:27 pm ]
Post subject: 

First of all, it was a joke.

Second, Sneasel could easily become a better Pokemon. It doesn't have great stats at the moment.

Author:  Mr. Saturn [ Sat Oct 30, 2004 9:53 pm ]
Post subject: 

Sableye needs to evolve. badly. It needs a stat boost and a better trait. Granted, not something uber *coughwonderguardcough*, but not the suckiness that is Keen Eye... why can't it have Clear Body or something?

Dunsparce needs to evolve, too.

Author:  FreemanTheGreatest [ Sun Oct 31, 2004 1:01 am ]
Post subject: 

maybe legandaries can be babies with rubbish stats while we catch them, then evolve into a 00ber...

Author:  SneakySneasel [ Mon Nov 01, 2004 10:43 am ]
Post subject:  hmmmmmm

FreemanTheGreatest wrote:
maybe legandaries can be babies with rubbish stats while we catch them, then evolve into a 00ber...


actually - that aint a half bad idea - good one. I think they should evolve after you have completed a goal - for example - 20 trades, or something...

Author:  psycho_freak [ Mon Nov 01, 2004 11:48 pm ]
Post subject: 

Mr. Saturn wrote:
Sableye needs to evolve. badly. It needs a stat boost and a better trait. Granted, not something uber *coughwonderguardcough*, but not the suckiness that is Keen Eye... why can't it have Clear Body or something?

Dunsparce needs to evolve, too.


Wonder Guard on Sableye would be very nice. Though any non-evolution pokemon that has bad stats (I am too lazy to make a list though Aipom is one) needs to evolve.

Author:  sN0wBaLL [ Wed Nov 03, 2004 12:38 am ]
Post subject: 

{aipom} , {yanma} , {dunsparce} , {gligar} , {shuckle}

It would be interesting if Pokemon like Ditto evolved. What would it have become, a greater mass of jelly? And maybe Corsola can evolve to a coral reef, porygon to lego, and octillery to sushi.

Author:  SneakySneasel [ Wed Nov 03, 2004 11:39 am ]
Post subject: 

sN0wBaLL wrote:
{aipom} , {yanma} , {dunsparce} , {gligar} , {shuckle}

It would be interesting if Pokemon like Ditto evolved. What would it have become, a greater mass of jelly? And maybe Corsola can evolve to a coral reef, porygon to lego, and octillery to sushi.


a porygon evolution alredy exists {porygon2} . you're right about a ditto evolution being interesting, however, what would it do? ditto could evolve into anything it has transformed to in the past??????????

Author:  scyther_girl [ Wed Nov 03, 2004 11:42 am ]
Post subject: 

dosen't {dunsparce} evolve into {gligar} ??
anyway, subleye's evolution would be interesting..
hmm.. sushi..

Author:  Mr. Saturn [ Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:31 pm ]
Post subject: 

psycho_freak wrote:
Mr. Saturn wrote:
Sableye needs to evolve. badly. It needs a stat boost and a better trait. Granted, not something uber *coughwonderguardcough*, but not the suckiness that is Keen Eye... why can't it have Clear Body or something?

Dunsparce needs to evolve, too.


Wonder Guard on Sableye would be very nice. Though any non-evolution pokemon that has bad stats (I am too lazy to make a list though Aipom is one) needs to evolve.


problem is, the simple fact that its only weakness would be fighting after using Foresight would make the game unfair...

and no, Dunsparce and Gligar are completely different.

Author:  Lance's Dragonair [ Wed Nov 03, 2004 5:34 pm ]
Post subject: 

Shuckle doesn't need and evolution. It's defense stats are already through the roof, there is no need for improvement. It's one of those token Pokemon that don't need evolutions (Ditto, Smeargle, Kecleon, Castform, Wobbuffet, and the legendaries) because they already serve their purpose.

Author:  Blazizard [ Wed Nov 03, 2004 8:51 pm ]
Post subject: 

I think {scyther} should have a pre-evolution. Like a baby or something. It would be neat. Opinions?

Author:  Blaziken Trainer [ Thu Nov 04, 2004 7:08 pm ]
Post subject: 

I think a Ditto evo'd be cool. hmmmmmmm... maybe call it uummmmmmm... Prango like "presto-chango".
Or maybe an E. stone evo like Pyrto (fire) or Freezto (ice) Florto (grass)




On a semi-related note, have you fought a Ditto with a legendary?
I'm staring down the barrel of another Aerticuno with the same moveset right now. hmm.

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/