| Psypoke http://www.psypokes.com/forums/ |
|
| Gen 5 Legendaries Discussion http://www.psypokes.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=26930 |
Page 3 of 3 |
| Author: | Anamator [ Sun Sep 12, 2010 11:05 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gen 5 Legendaries Assumptions/Ideas Discussion |
of corse they stole it out of Terminator: salvation. but obviously the third in the mascot trio, has Dragon/(plasma containing type like pychyc) because that's how it' obviously being themed. |
|
| Author: | rex09 [ Sun Sep 12, 2010 11:09 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gen 5 Legendaries Assumptions/Ideas Discussion |
Steelbound wrote: of corse they stole it out of Terminator: salvation. but obviously the third in the mascot trio, has Dragon/(plasma containing type like pychyc) because that's how it' obviously being themed. actually, the third of the mascot trio is dragon/ice. it's on the main site. and it seems like a pretty cool typing, to boot. |
|
| Author: | DarkTrainer13 [ Sun Sep 12, 2010 3:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gen 5 Legendaries Assumptions/Ideas Discussion |
rex09 wrote: it seems like a pretty cool typing, to boot. Indeed it is, a Dragon pokemon that is not weak to Ice are good, even if it is a legendary. |
|
| Author: | AceTrainer [ Wed Sep 15, 2010 5:47 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gen 5 Legendaries Assumptions/Ideas Discussion |
Has anyone seen the legendaries leaked by the same site that gave us the supposed starter evolutions (that turned out right)? I'm reserving comments right now, I want to see what others think. Btw, I can't copy the picture and paste it here. |
|
| Author: | Anamator [ Wed Sep 15, 2010 2:33 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gen 5 Legendaries Assumptions/Ideas Discussion |
when posting, click on img. then on the website, right click and chose properties. coppy the hyperlink and put where the img thing is. |
|
| Author: | robbydebry [ Wed Sep 15, 2010 3:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gen 5 Legendaries Assumptions/Ideas Discussion |
wait is this pokexperto or pokebeach? |
|
| Author: | robbydebry [ Wed Sep 15, 2010 3:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gen 5 Legendaries Assumptions/Ideas Discussion |
okay these are from pokexperto (who gave us the starters and is extremely cerdible) one is gigasu's evo line the other is planta's evo (edit: I appologize for the double post) |
|
| Author: | rex09 [ Wed Sep 15, 2010 3:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gen 5 Legendaries Assumptions/Ideas Discussion |
Gigaisu's evo line pic looks weird... the first and last are definitely legit pokemon, but the first and second's pics look fan-made. The way that the colors are more vibrant, and there's less detail (gigaisu has scratches and stuff on him; the other two don't) leads me to believe that the middle evo could be fake. *shrug* not like it really matters if is, lol. but i think gigaisu will be either like geodude's line, or metagross'. |
|
| Author: | DarkTrainer13 [ Wed Sep 15, 2010 9:46 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gen 5 Legendaries Assumptions/Ideas Discussion |
rex09 wrote: i think gigaisu will be either like geodude's line, or metagross'. Agreed, the picture makes me think that Gigasu will be a pokemon with great stats. And it must have a Rock-type. |
|
| Author: | robbydebry [ Thu Sep 16, 2010 3:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gen 5 Legendaries Assumptions/Ideas Discussion |
I'm excited for this gen, hopefully they make more creative ways to evolve! (is it going to be possible to get a glaceon, leafeon, magnazone, ect... after this gen?) |
|
| Author: | Anamator [ Thu Sep 16, 2010 4:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gen 5 Legendaries Assumptions/Ideas Discussion |
THAT s creepy, do i have ESP or something? Steelbound wrote: As For the Flying-type, i dont know? i'm guessing it's a cloud thing (unless altaria fills the spot) the truth is , i'm not sure. Like, that's creepy, it's lieraly, a cloud. i am freaked out. as for the third mascot, it looks lke someones gandma. honestly, any other thigs to say? |
|
| Author: | AceTrainer [ Fri Sep 17, 2010 12:24 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gen 5 Legendaries Assumptions/Ideas Discussion |
Flying legend trios are wtf? and the fighting types are darn quadrupeds, and the blue one looks deformed of some sort. Wonder what myth they were based off? |
|
| Author: | Anamator [ Fri Sep 17, 2010 6:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gen 5 Legendaries Discussion |
(Dur, like i just got the idea when i was at my frends house man... talkin about nature), potheads aside, i think that the flying ones represet weather (rain, wind, Hail) but, i dont know. |
|
| Author: | GofD [ Sat Sep 18, 2010 6:04 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gen 5 Legendaries Discussion |
The fighting legendaries are not what I expected for a fighting type.( This has got to be a hommage to gold n silver). The Dragon/Ice is.... I gotta see a better pic of it first. The Space cannon bug is SWEET. Too bad it's an event pokemon. (ILL probably get the game when all the event pokemn are done or when there's only one event left.) As for the flying trio, meh. Could be better could be worse. |
|
| Author: | Anamator [ Sat Sep 18, 2010 10:47 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gen 5 Legendaries Discussion |
as long as i can get legit events without hacking, i'm gona get it after the bugs are out of the game. |
|
| Author: | Aquadude [ Thu Oct 28, 2010 4:33 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gen 5 Legendaries Discussion |
I dont consider this necromancy But magus got his wish of fighting type legendaries, and Mektar called It on the ice dragon. Although why did they have to make the pure flying type a legendary. |
|
| Author: | robbydebry [ Sat Oct 30, 2010 11:46 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gen 5 Legendaries Discussion |
actually a pure flying type is worse than a flying/normal it has the same weaknesses and resistances, however a normal/flying is immune to ghost type attacks and a normal/flying will get a STAB for normal as well as flying, and as for the previously mentioned issue concerning roost, I don't think that a pure flying type can learn roost |
|
| Author: | graah2 [ Sat Oct 30, 2010 2:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gen 5 Legendaries Discussion |
the new flying types suck they're just recolours + small change its DUMB! |
|
| Author: | Rhapsody [ Sat Oct 30, 2010 3:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gen 5 Legendaries Discussion |
I think they would have functioned better if they were only one Pokemon - individually, I think they're okay (their design isn't really to my liking, but I don't hate them on principle). As a trio, however... bleh. They could have at least given them different poses. Other than them, I like most of the new legendaries. Reshiram, Zekrom, Meloetta, the Grass/Fighting thing and Kerudio are all pretty sweet, especially Meloetta. The other two Fighting types and Genosect are alright. |
|
| Author: | Master Zoroark [ Sat Oct 30, 2010 5:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gen 5 Legendaries Discussion |
Why does the main site use Reshiramu and Zekuromu instead of Reshiram and Zekrom? Their english names ARE confirmed to be Reshiram and Zekrom after all, so why is the PsyDex using the (incorrect) romanizations of their names? |
|
| Page 3 of 3 | All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|